mme_hardy: White rose (Default)
mme_hardy ([personal profile] mme_hardy) wrote2017-10-29 08:45 am
Entry tags:

Great moments in sexual harassment

Cabinet Office to investigate after minister admits asking assistant to buy sex toys

Gulp. An assistant's job is not an 'appy one. But wait, there's more!

“I’m not going to be dishonest,” Garnier said. He insisted that referring to [his assistant] Edmondson as “sugar tits”, as she says he did, was a reference to the popular BBC comedy Gavin and Stacey, saying: “It absolutely does not constitute harassment.”
dsrtao: dsr as a LEGO minifig (Default)

[personal profile] dsrtao 2017-10-29 05:32 pm (UTC)(link)
It was only barely not harassment on Gavin and Stacey. Context and consent.
lizbee: (Random: Daria hug)

[personal profile] lizbee 2017-10-29 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)
“I’m not going to be dishonest,” Garnier said. He insisted that referring to [his assistant] Edmondson as “sugar tits”, as she says he did, was a reference to the popular BBC comedy Gavin and Stacey, saying: “It absolutely does not constitute harassment.”

You know, a few weeks back, I got into a bit of a thing on Twitter with a local comedian/writer/actor, expressing disappointment that he referred to his boyfriend as "a bit of a pussy". I thought I was being quite measured, emphasising that I like his work, and think he's a decent guy, but reading that was like a slap in the face.

The man himself seemed to take it well, but I was inundated with blokes coming in to tell me that he was just using "pussy" to mean "weak or pathetic", so it wasn't misogynist at all.

My point is this: are men too emotional and irrational to be trusted to use language?
edenfalling: stylized black-and-white line art of a sunset over water (Default)

[personal profile] edenfalling 2017-10-30 01:32 am (UTC)(link)
*headdesks forever*