mme_hardy: White rose (Default)
The Antioch Review, America's oldest continuously-produced literary journal, chose to run an essay called "The Sacred Androgen: The Transgender Debate" by Daniel Harris. (Harris is the author of  Diary of a Drag Queen, in which he discovers that he is no longer young and handsome enough to attract other gay men, but that if he cross-dresses he can attract "straight" men. )  If you want to see Harris's badly-written anti-transperson rant, it's here. You Have Been Warned. Many transpeople have already laid out, in detail, why this rant is both bigoted and factually incorrect. Before (if) you read the following, read what Gabrielle Bellot, a transperson, has to say.

In response to the anger, Antioch College issued a statement that said, in part, " Antioch College does not condone or always agree with the ideas and viewpoints expressed in the Review. We do, however, have confidence in the Review’s editor and editorial process, and support a key Antiochian value -- the free expression of ideas and opinions, even when they run counter to our own. As a college, we encourage our students, faculty and the broader community to engage in critical thought and dialogue around important issues, including this one."

"Critical thought" has a meaning. It does not encompass "a core dump of unexamined prejudice presented as fact." For an essay to represent critical thought, it must first and foremost be an essay, not a blog post. An essay has a thesis; each paragraph must be connected to the previous and following paragraphs, unless that paragraph is specifically noted as starting a new argument. A hypothetical "critical thought" anti-transpeople essay ought, at a minimum, to meet this standard in order to be published in a literary magazine.

Let's examine the first five paragraphs of this "essay". I'm summarizing with bonus snark.
  1. Transpeople (referred to as "TGs" for some reason; I'm not going to reproduce this tic further) are human.
    1. It sucks to be them because violence, murder, HIV, unemployment, ...
    2. "Many commentators" have said they ought to have civil rights which ought to be addressed by both "politicians and everyday citizens."
  2. Transgender people are mean to cis people by expecting cis people to change their behavior.
    1. They have "entangled us in a snare of such trivialities as the proper pronouns with which to address them, protocol as Byzantine and patronizing as the etiquette for addressing royalty. They insult us with the pejorative term “cisgender,” which they use to describe those of us who accept, however unenthusiastically (it. mine.) , our birth gender, as opposed to the enlightened few who question their sex. Moreover, they shame us into silence by ridiculing the blunders we make while trying to come to grips with their unique dilemmas, decrying our curiosity about their bodies as prurience and our unwillingness, or even inability, to enter into their own (often unsuccessful) illusion as narrow‑mindedness."
      1. [I can't even].
  3. Janet Mock was mean to Pierce [sic] Morgan. "Mock organized a kind of witch hunt in which she accused the liberal and tolerant [citation needed] Pierce Morgan of having, in her words, “misgendered” her merely because he had questioned her about her past and leapt to the conclusion—medical records would surely bear this out—that she had in her youth changed her gender."
    1. Cis people are being oppressed.
    2. You can't tell cis people what to think. "TGs cannot expect to dictate to us the terms of the discussion, for we are thinking people, too, and nothing, notwithstanding many activists’ attempts to embarrass us into uncritical consensus, can stop us from thinking our thoughts. " Here are my thoughts.
  4. Trans plastic surgery is different from other kinds of plastic surgery.
    1. Everybody hates other kinds of plastic surgery anyway.
    2. Donatella Versace's, Tara Reid's, and Kim Novak's bodies are especially gross. I note in particular Tara Reid's breasts.
  5. [topic sentence] Michael Jackson's face was gross, too.
    1. "And yet what is the actual difference between Michael Jackson whittling his nose down to a brittle sliver of bone and whitening his skin with alpha hydroxy acid and arsenic in order to efface his blackness and the TG sanding down her brow bone and hacking off a sizeable chunk of her mandible in order to efface her gender?
This is not an essay. This is incoherent core-dump bigotry. No competent literary editor would ever have printed it unless they shared its bigotry. There is no other reason to print it. The university cannot hide behind "confidence in the Review’s editor and editorial process" when the Review made an objectively bad editorial decision, as evaluated by the usual standards of writing, independent of the usual standards of everyday decency.
mme_hardy: White rose (Default)
If you are trying to find an expert on the cons of teenage gender transition, maybe you could find an expert who doesn't insist on referring to Caitlyn Jenner as "he" and "Bruce"?

Dr. Paul McHugh, a professor of psychiatry at Johns Hopkins University Medical School and its hospital’s former psychiatrist in chief, is skeptical of the use of surgery for a psychological condition, and even more so for children. “Bruce Jenner — who cares?” said Dr. McHugh, who said he played a role in closing a transgender surgery program at Johns Hopkins about 35 years ago. “He’s a wonderfully successful person. He’s got all kinds of social networks. He’s got plenty of money. No one’s objecting to him if he wants to live as a woman. This is America, be my guest."

How kind of the good doctor to give permission.

e from

McHugh himself admits to directing Meyer to conduct to further his anti-trans agenda in a 2004 article titled “Surgical Sex”. In the same article, McHugh also continues to preach the largely discredited “autogynephilia” theory of Ray Blanchard and J. Michael Bailey. McHugh is also known for filing an amicus curiae brief in Hollingsworth v. Perry, asserting that homosexuality is a choice, as well as for his participation of the campaign against Kansas abortion provider Dr George Tiller- who was murdered in 2009 by a anti-abortion activist.

I shall be writing my usual Strong Letter.


mme_hardy: White rose (Default)

October 2017

1 234 567
89101112 13 14
1516 1718192021


RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

  • Style: Indil for Ciel by nornoriel

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 20th, 2017 11:18 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios