mme_hardy: White rose (Default)
[personal profile] mme_hardy
I read the first volume of Divergent --I won't be reading the second, the first was very silly -- and my visceral reaction to the premise was just echoed in Vanity Fair.

Right off the bat, something is wrong with Divergent, the new teen action film based on the popular Y.A. book series. The people of the story, who live in a dystopian future Chicago, have split themselves up into five rigidly maintained factions, each with its own roles and philosophies: Abnegation (the selfless administrators), Dauntless (the protectors), Candor (the truth-tellers), Erudite (the intellectuals), and Amity (the placid farmers). Why are three of those names nouns and two adjectives? Couldn’t the smart faction be called Erudition, and the warrior group be called something like, I dunno, Bravery? It doesn’t make sense!


What he said. Threw me clean out of the book for five minutes or so while I tried to come up with a consistent set of names. Apparently parallelism was beaten into me with a rod of adamantium.

Date: 2014-03-20 04:49 pm (UTC)
nestra: (books)
From: [personal profile] nestra
I enjoyed the first one well enough. The second started to get bogged down in exposition, and the third one was crap. Serious structural flaws.

Profile

mme_hardy: White rose (Default)
mme_hardy

December 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

  • Style: Indil for Ciel by nornoriel

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 9th, 2025 12:37 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios