![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I keep thinking that I don't need to post this, but I have been livid with rage for some hours.
So, the Guardian ran an unsigned transphobic editorial today (not linking; you can find it if you search for gender) based on an investigation, the Cass Review, which published a transphobic interim report.
Here are some of the unexamined assumptions.
Vile.
So, the Guardian ran an unsigned transphobic editorial today (not linking; you can find it if you search for gender) based on an investigation, the Cass Review, which published a transphobic interim report.
Here are some of the unexamined assumptions.
- There are no negative consequences to delaying recognition of a child's trans status.
- Acknowledging a child's gender expression without making any other intervention causes unspecified harm to the child should they decide to affirm their previous gender.
- Because some adults regret their gender transition, that means that all children should be prevented from gender-aware therapy in case they should later regret it.
- Because some non-cis children also have "complex mental health issues" or are on the autism spectrum, these are actually causing the non-cis children to think they are non-cis.
- Adult trans people's opinions, based on their own childhood experiences, are "a result of adult affinities to an unevidenced worldview".
- Children who use puberty blockers often grow up to use "cross-sex hormones" (notice that phrase); this may mean that "puberty blockers interfere with the natural resolution of gender dysphoria". [THE NATURAL RESULT OBVIOUSLY BEING THAT YOU OUTGROW IT]
- "This 'affirmative approach' leaves little space for exploration of the potential relationship between their dysphoria and neurodiversity or psychosocial needs, including those arising from childhood trauma or internalised hostility to same-sex attraction."
Vile.
no subject
Date: 2022-03-20 09:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-03-20 11:29 pm (UTC)